I used to run an incubator. We had some successes, as measured by the quality of start-up companies that went through the program (many of which still exist and some of which were sold for large amounts of money!), and we had some problems that we never quite solved. The biggest and most obvious challenge was that incubators are hard to fund, and difficult to sustain over the long term, unless there’s a willingness to (a) select only companies that have high growth potential and (b) if the incubator itself is in a position to somehow benefit from the success of the companies it supports. Unfortunately, the incubator I ran back in the first few years of this century was not configured to be able to benefit from the growth of the companies it helped start. If I were to do it again, I’d fix that.

 

Anyway, I still get asked every so often to offer some ideas on what our state and local governments can do to help promote effective incubation of early stage, high-growth ventures. I was recently approached to do just that, and offered up the following.    Warning: some of the following is a little inflammatory, but this is my space, so here goes:  

  • It is time for the state of Virginia (the same goes for other states, by the way, but I live in Virginia …) to stop focusing its business support programs on companies that fit the traditional “small company” model, i.e., retail, services, sole proprietorships, light manufacturing, and the like.  Despite their political clout, such companies are at the tail end of the innovation chain, and do not “drive the economy”.   Instead, the state and local economic development departments should focus on new, high-growth companies, and STOP worrying about companies that start small and are designed to stay small!  Study after study has shown that such “life-style” companies do not have a net impact on job creation over the long term and it’s time to stop bending over backward to support them.  
  • It’s time to consider a New Business Administration to replace the Small Business Administration.  A growing number of studies have shown that the bulk of net job creation comes from new companies that start small, but are designed to grow.  According to the Kauffman Foundation, for example, new, high-growth companies have consistently produced between 2/3 and 3/4 of the net new jobs since World War II.  The key here is “new”, as in innovative approaches to emerging markets, and “high-growth” as in “sure, we’re small now, but we plan to grow and you’d better invest now while the opportunity is still available!”    
  • If we do a better job at supporting new, high-growth companies, all those traditional, “life-style” companies will benefit as well, because the high growth companies and their employees become the core customers that support all the other kinds of companies in the economy.  
  • Generally speaking, new, high-growth companies need four things:  
    • Access to capital that is appropriate to their growth stage and industry (in most cases, this means equity capital, not loans);  
    • Access to professional advice & counsel that reflects their growth stage and industry;  
    • Access to talent and technologies (again, I’m not just talking about technology companies – the need for new technologies is a productivity and business model-enabler that has helped companies of all types grow into new markets); and  
    • Access to networks of people and institutions that enable the prior three items.   
  • Incubators are Programs, not Buildings: Let’s be clear what we mean when we say “Incubator.” They come in several forms and, when done right, can have a meaningful impact on the larger economic environment (including the “entrepreneurial culture” of the region in which they operate).   In short, an incubator that builds a “program” focused on providing the four things listed in the previous item will be successful in attracting and nurturing new, high-growth companies. An Incubator that doesn’t will ultimately devolve into a real-estate venture, offering little more than cheap space and warm place to sit, or worse.  
  • Successful Incubators fill an unmet need:    Duh … An incubator that focuses on the kind of companies that already exist in a region (e.g., military contractors in Hampton Roads …) is not making much of a difference.   At the risk of annoying some folks, an Incubator should help the region target new and different markets, and be a catalyst for ideas that are outside the usual way of doing business.  Incubators should lead, not follow, and it’s not leadership if the incubator is helping take the region to where it already is …  
  • Culture matters and, with the right leadership, incubators can play an important role in integrating the services that are available in a region and provide a focal point for the energy and passion that is vital for growth of a region’s entrepreneurial environment.  Put another way, incubators only work if they are a highly visible part of the entrepreneurial environment in a region and play an active, hands-on role in encouraging entrepreneurship and celebrating the successes of new companies in the region.  
  • The incubator has to evolve as the region evolves!  With any luck, there comes a time when the entrepreneurial culture in a region is robust enough that incubators can begin to provide less comprehensive services, and focus more on specific markets, technologies, or niche requirements. In other words, if a prospective entrepreneur can easily plug-in to a network of early-stage investors, professional managers, service providers, employees, partners, and customers (!) without having to enlist the broad, hands-on the support of an incubator program, the region has clearly matured, and the incubator program should reflect that reality.  There are still a number of very successful incubators in Silicon Valley, for example, but they focus on much different issues than they did before and during the internet boom of the late 1990s.   Here’s hoping that there comes a time when we can say the same thing here in Hampton Roads.  

 

As always, if there’s anyone out there reading this stuff, don’t hesitate to send me a note with your thoughts (Marty@General-Ideas.com).    

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marty Kaszubowski is President of General Ideas, a Norfolk-based technology venture consultancy, helping early stage companies and solo entrepreneurs figure out what they want to be when they grow up.  Marty is the former Director of the Hampton Roads Technology Incubator and a former President of the Hampton Roads Technology Council, and is a long-time participant in the on-going, regional efforts to promote a more robust entrepreneurial culture here in Hampton Roads.  Marty can be reached at Marty@General-Ideas.com.

 

Share this page
Facebook Delicious Twitter Digg Blogmarks Slashdot Technorati Stumbleupon